As KAIT News in Arkansas alludes to, many body-worn cameras (BWC) have a mute function which allows the camera to continue to record video, but the audio can be temporarily disabled. When muting does occur, the question that may arise is, are officers muting the audio for a cause, or is there malicious intent?
It is common for many department policies to have exceptions when audio can be muted if that functionality is enabled. For example, an officer may be authorized to utilize the mute function to speak with a detective on a crime scene regarding investigative matters. Occasional use of muting may be permissible and warranted, but if a pattern emerges, and officers are found to be making a habit out of using the functionality, it could indicate malicious intent.
Body-worn camera recordings must be treated with the same care as any other evidence. Intentionally failing to record, activating late, deactivating early, or any other misuse can have serious consequences for officers and departments.
Department executives should remain steadfast in their efforts to constantly evaluate their BWC policy and make changes as necessary. A comprehensive policy and accompanying training are the backbone of a successful BWC program. Let Principis Group Inc., and our subject matter experts, assist you in the development of a successful program. For more information, see our Body-Worn Camera Training Seminars at Principisgroup.com
Comments